Talk:History of pre-classical economic thought: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger m (Talk:History of ancient economics moved to Talk:History of pre-classical economic thought: More accurate phraseology) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:Yes, I think I agree it should be merged with the new one. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 07:54, 21 September 2007 (CDT) | :Yes, I think I agree it should be merged with the new one. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 07:54, 21 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
The name [[history of pre-classical economic thought]] precisely states the topic of the article. "Ancient economics" implies economics, not economic thought, and of Greece and Rome, not of everything before Smith. Richard may use his comma convention in history articles, until we vote on the issue, but I draw the line there. Stated policy is not to use that comma convention. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:06, 24 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
== rewrite == | == rewrite == | ||
I did not rewrite the article but dropped repeated duplications, as well as exaggerated claims about Ibn Khaldun (who did not have much influence beyond his lifetime. Article needs to be moved to [[History of economic thought, pre-classical]] [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 09:41, 24 September 2007 (CDT) | I did not rewrite the article but dropped repeated duplications, as well as exaggerated claims about Ibn Khaldun (who did not have much influence beyond his lifetime. Article needs to be moved to [[History of economic thought, pre-classical]] [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 09:41, 24 September 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 09:06, 24 September 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Economics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 06:43, 24 September 2007 (CDT)Petréa Mitchell 21:42, 9 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
This article was moved from History of Ancient Economics in order to conform to Citizendium Naming conventions. The redirects were protected so they shoud still allow the links. --Matt Innis (Talk) 23:01, 1 April 2007 (CDT)
new name needed
this article is about the history of economic thought to 1776, and should say so. There is a proposal to change the Economics article to Economic Thought, History, where this article would also fit. Richard Jensen 07:47, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, I think I agree it should be merged with the new one. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:54, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
The name history of pre-classical economic thought precisely states the topic of the article. "Ancient economics" implies economics, not economic thought, and of Greece and Rome, not of everything before Smith. Richard may use his comma convention in history articles, until we vote on the issue, but I draw the line there. Stated policy is not to use that comma convention. --Larry Sanger 10:06, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
rewrite
I did not rewrite the article but dropped repeated duplications, as well as exaggerated claims about Ibn Khaldun (who did not have much influence beyond his lifetime. Article needs to be moved to History of economic thought, pre-classical Richard Jensen 09:41, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
- Economics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Economics Advanced Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Economics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Economics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Economics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Economics External Articles
- Economics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Economics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup