Forum Talk:Content: Difference between revisions
imported>Greg Martin (→Number vs. Numeral: human-readable) |
imported>Stephen Ewen (Images) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
''Random comment: I responded to your comment about "human-readable" on [[User_talk:Greg_Woodhouse#Number_and_Numeral|Greg's talk page]]. - [[User:Greg Martin|Greg Martin]] 15:58, 29 April 2007 (CDT)'' | ''Random comment: I responded to your comment about "human-readable" on [[User_talk:Greg_Woodhouse#Number_and_Numeral|Greg's talk page]]. - [[User:Greg Martin|Greg Martin]] 15:58, 29 April 2007 (CDT)'' | ||
== Images == | |||
{{badimage}} [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 21:49, 30 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:49, 30 April 2007
Pat Palmer's User Talk Archives |
Archive 1, 4-27-07: User_talk:Pat_Palmer/Archive1 |
Unix-like
Yes, I've had the pleasure of working with several variants of Unix in the past, actually. Thanks for the note, though :-) --Joshua David Williams 21:41, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
Your JIT image
Pat, what did you create
with? It looks a lot more professional than my
. I'm running Linux, and the closest thing I've found to making professional-looking diagrams is maybe OpenOffice Draw. Eric M Gearhart
- Re: "He he. That thing is a patchwork."
Yes mine is too unfortunately. I started work on it during a slow shift at work with MS Paint (when every link we monitor is green it gets boring in Iraq...) and finished it in the KDE equivalent of paint, Kolourpaint. It's a big hack too unfortunately. I will try my hand at recreating it in maybe OO.o draw or GIMP or something. Also I'd like to add more descriptive icons to each layer, such as Tux on the OS layer, Duke on the Java layer and something that represents "programs" on the "Actual Java Program" layer.
In reference to Paint Shop Pro, I've read about Paint.NET, which is an open source "better Paint than Paint." Have you tried it? If I can I'll try and get it working in Mono on Linux :/ Eric M Gearhart
If you're rested....
..feel free to take her away. There is clearly something obvious I am missing in the stacked if statements. We could revert back to only having two groups but I am pretty sure from the checklists i have seen we will need to be able to accomodate three different workgroups. Chris Day (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
- I think i figured out a partial solution. I say partial since the group2 parameter must be used before the group 3 one, but i think we can live with that. See what you think. Thanks for any input and tweek/ rewrites. Chris Day (talk) 23:31, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
Number vs. Numeral
I see you've changing "numeral" to "number" in a number (no pun intended) of places. I wonder what the rationale is: my undefrsgtanding is that a numeral is a symbolic or graphic representation of a number. So, it makes sense to call 110 the representation of 6 (thought of as a number) as a binary numeral. The dictionary definition seems to allow not only "digits" but groups of symbols that, taken together, represent numbers as numerals. Greg Woodhouse 13:46, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
Random comment: I responded to your comment about "human-readable" on Greg's talk page. - Greg Martin 15:58, 29 April 2007 (CDT)
Images
Hi. We appreciate very much your contributions to the Citizendium. I was hoping you could help clear up a matter about the images you recently uploaded. They are lacking clear copyright and source data and need to have it as soon as practicable to avoid deletion. To fix the problem, please review the images you uploaded (click on "my contributions" at the upper-right to re-trace your steps or see the links I added) in light of Images Help—Copyrights. If you need additional help, just ask a constable or leave a message on my talk page and I'll be more than glad to assist. — Stephen Ewen 21:49, 30 April 2007 (CDT)