CZ Talk:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians: Difference between revisions
imported>Thomas E Kelly (workgroups) |
imported>Thomas E Kelly |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Applying to become an editor of a workgroup... | Applying to become an editor of a workgroup... | ||
Will add more later. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 19:44, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | Will add more ideas later. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 19:44, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 30 March 2007
Hey Steve, let me leave this in your hands. See CZ:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians for what I worked on--feel free to fold it in, or not use it. I didn't realize that you were at work on this, or I wouldn't have bothered. --Larry Sanger 14:48, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
workgroups
workgroups build collaboration that wp did not/does not have always.
workgroup recent changes allow you to monitor article changes within a general field.
wikipedia had sub-categories that only allowed you to monitor recent changes within that small sub-category instead of a general category like "biology workgroup."
Articles need to get tagged with workgroup tags for workgroup recent changes to work to its full potential.
Adding your name as an author to a workgroup...
Applying to become an editor of a workgroup...
Will add more ideas later. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 19:44, 30 March 2007 (CDT)