CZ Talk:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians: Difference between revisions
imported>Thomas E Kelly |
imported>Thomas E Kelly (?) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Will add more ideas later. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 19:44, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | Will add more ideas later. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 19:44, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
== ? == | |||
Really? | |||
"At Wikipedia, creating lots of stubs is considered productive. Someone will always come along and add to it, "eventually". At Citizendium, we feel it is much better to start one or just a few articles, and concentrate on them until they are approved." | |||
This is policy? [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 20:09, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:09, 30 March 2007
Hey Steve, let me leave this in your hands. See CZ:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians for what I worked on--feel free to fold it in, or not use it. I didn't realize that you were at work on this, or I wouldn't have bothered. --Larry Sanger 14:48, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
workgroups
workgroups build collaboration that wp did not/does not have.
workgroup recent changes allow you to monitor article changes within a general field.
wikipedia had sub-categories that only allowed you to monitor recent changes within that small sub-category instead of a general category like "biology workgroup."
Articles need to get tagged with workgroup tags for workgroup recent changes to work to its full potential.
Adding your name as an author to a workgroup...
Applying to become an editor of a workgroup...
Will add more ideas later. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 19:44, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
?
Really?
"At Wikipedia, creating lots of stubs is considered productive. Someone will always come along and add to it, "eventually". At Citizendium, we feel it is much better to start one or just a few articles, and concentrate on them until they are approved."
This is policy? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 20:09, 30 March 2007 (CDT)