Talk:Karl Marx: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(let experts handle this please)
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:


Larry--let's your experts handle this one please. Let the philosphers contribute but so far they have not made a contribution here.  As fir the economists, he's a minor figure as the article explains. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 13:44, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
Larry--let's your experts handle this one please. Let the philosphers contribute but so far they have not made a contribution here.  As fir the economists, he's a minor figure as the article explains. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 13:44, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
::This is a tough call. In the narrow social sciences, Marx's contribution is I think in the order Politics, Sociology, Economics. History is clearly a major component -- not only because of his historical importance, but also because of the role of history in his own writings. Arguably, his account of the transition from feudalism to capitalism was the best thing he wrote. And, yes, he also has a role in philosophy. How to prioritise? I have no idea. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 13:48, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:48, 20 October 2007


Article Checklist for "Karl Marx"
Workgroup category or categories Philosophy Workgroup, History Workgroup, Politics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Larry Sanger 13:29, 20 October 2007 (CDT); Eddie Ortiz Nieves 10:59, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Richard, sorry, but Marx is obviously a philosopher first and foremost, and an economist. Those are the subjects that he wrote about and is famous for. He also really belongs in politics because of his foremost position as the political theoretician of the left. He had a great impact on history, obviously, but via his impact on philosophy, economics, and politics. The leading experts about Marx are not historians, but philosophers, economists, and political theorists. --Larry Sanger 13:29, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

Larry--let's your experts handle this one please. Let the philosphers contribute but so far they have not made a contribution here. As fir the economists, he's a minor figure as the article explains. Richard Jensen 13:44, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

This is a tough call. In the narrow social sciences, Marx's contribution is I think in the order Politics, Sociology, Economics. History is clearly a major component -- not only because of his historical importance, but also because of the role of history in his own writings. Arguably, his account of the transition from feudalism to capitalism was the best thing he wrote. And, yes, he also has a role in philosophy. How to prioritise? I have no idea. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 13:48, 20 October 2007 (CDT)