User talk:William Hart: Difference between revisions
imported>William Hart |
imported>David Tribe |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:::Sure, no problems. I was never a big WP contributor, so I don't really know much about the best way to do things. You're welcome to delete the comments from the discussion page along with my response if you want, or leave it there as you wish. You could even transfer it all to this page if you wanted. But maybe it isn't that important. To further answer your questions, I'm actually considering not contributing much more to the article, just to see how it develops from here. I think it is fairly neutral (apart from the Popper comment, which I think Gareth contributed), and I'm just curious to see how it "evolves" under the "intelligent" direction of future contributors. Your summary for your single edit to the article was pretty funny by the way. I feel that my piles and arthritis were perfectly designed to achieve their end. :-) [[User:William Hart|William Hart]] 08:06, 17 February 2007 (CST) | :::Sure, no problems. I was never a big WP contributor, so I don't really know much about the best way to do things. You're welcome to delete the comments from the discussion page along with my response if you want, or leave it there as you wish. You could even transfer it all to this page if you wanted. But maybe it isn't that important. To further answer your questions, I'm actually considering not contributing much more to the article, just to see how it develops from here. I think it is fairly neutral (apart from the Popper comment, which I think Gareth contributed), and I'm just curious to see how it "evolves" under the "intelligent" direction of future contributors. Your summary for your single edit to the article was pretty funny by the way. I feel that my piles and arthritis were perfectly designed to achieve their end. :-) [[User:William Hart|William Hart]] 08:06, 17 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:::: I'm relieved that I hav'nt seriously offended you. I'm sill thinking of relegating Popper name to the footnotes.!I really welcome much your copy edits on HGT ( I have since installed Firefox 2 with its spell checker and those issues will go away now I hope. I've slapped a To Approve tag on V 1.1, 24 hours time limit. More seriously and genuinely, I've reflected futher about your credentials for ID, ans on the basis or neutrality now see that you may be idealy qualified. I hope that you take my clumsiness as a disincentive to participate further. The story cris out for an inding. I might sometime finfd time to do the flagella bit. I had to stay away the last 24 hours [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 15:48, 18 February 2007 (CST). |
Revision as of 16:48, 18 February 2007
[User-supplied bio goes in User:Your Name]
Welcome
Citizendium Getting Started | |||
---|---|---|---|
Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians |
Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!
You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link Citizendium_Pilot:Discipline_Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.
Kind Regards,
Robert Tito | Talk 08:09, 15 February 2007 (CST)
Hi William, thanks for the start on intelligent design. Could you give us a bio please? --Larry Sanger 09:07, 15 February 2007 (CST)
- Apologies for not realising this was a better place for questions about bio details. You've answered the point of my question pertinently and appropriately. I intend to delete my remarks from the talk page on the article (but will revert if you'd prefer they remain there). David Tribe 07:54, 17 February 2007 (CST)
- Sure, no problems. I was never a big WP contributor, so I don't really know much about the best way to do things. You're welcome to delete the comments from the discussion page along with my response if you want, or leave it there as you wish. You could even transfer it all to this page if you wanted. But maybe it isn't that important. To further answer your questions, I'm actually considering not contributing much more to the article, just to see how it develops from here. I think it is fairly neutral (apart from the Popper comment, which I think Gareth contributed), and I'm just curious to see how it "evolves" under the "intelligent" direction of future contributors. Your summary for your single edit to the article was pretty funny by the way. I feel that my piles and arthritis were perfectly designed to achieve their end. :-) William Hart 08:06, 17 February 2007 (CST)
- I'm relieved that I hav'nt seriously offended you. I'm sill thinking of relegating Popper name to the footnotes.!I really welcome much your copy edits on HGT ( I have since installed Firefox 2 with its spell checker and those issues will go away now I hope. I've slapped a To Approve tag on V 1.1, 24 hours time limit. More seriously and genuinely, I've reflected futher about your credentials for ID, ans on the basis or neutrality now see that you may be idealy qualified. I hope that you take my clumsiness as a disincentive to participate further. The story cris out for an inding. I might sometime finfd time to do the flagella bit. I had to stay away the last 24 hours David Tribe 15:48, 18 February 2007 (CST).
- Sure, no problems. I was never a big WP contributor, so I don't really know much about the best way to do things. You're welcome to delete the comments from the discussion page along with my response if you want, or leave it there as you wish. You could even transfer it all to this page if you wanted. But maybe it isn't that important. To further answer your questions, I'm actually considering not contributing much more to the article, just to see how it develops from here. I think it is fairly neutral (apart from the Popper comment, which I think Gareth contributed), and I'm just curious to see how it "evolves" under the "intelligent" direction of future contributors. Your summary for your single edit to the article was pretty funny by the way. I feel that my piles and arthritis were perfectly designed to achieve their end. :-) William Hart 08:06, 17 February 2007 (CST)